Organization
Information is power. Democratic participation is enhanced by accurate and unbiased research. The Centre for Youth Policy allows young students to make this possible by disseminating quality research by and for the youth, helping them to develop as a socio-political category.
39 articles found
Serbia’s student movement won a parliamentary majority tonight. Not one of its 250 candidates is a student. That choice is the most interesting thing about the result.
CYP brought together 15 young leaders from 11 nations for a three day forum.
What is next for CYP Research?
From climate to displacement, Rahman aims to make the UNGA a forum where youth voices truly count.
Hungary's youth voted out the only leader most of them have ever known. Here is what the polling showed, and what it means.
Nepal swears in its youngest-ever cabinet — average age 38. What this means for youth governance, democratic incorporation, and the generation that refused to wait.
Nepal's Gen Z didn't just protest; they won. How a rapper-turned-engineer became the world's youngest Prime Minister and what it means for youth democracy globally.
Can young people who topple governments actually win them? As Nepal heads to the polls on March 5th, Bangladesh offers a cautionary tale.
Standing at a fork in a road with nearly 60% of its population under the age of 30, the integration of young voices into the political process is not merely a matter of demographic representation for Jordan but a strategic imperative for national stability and future development. Therefore, at a surface level, the nation's response with reform; entailing the implementation of youth quotas in parliament, lowered the candidacy age, and introduction of pro-youth legal frameworks should receive appraisal. However, beneath this progressive rhetoric lies a complex reality shaped by deep-rooted structural challenges, economic pressures, and social attitudes that raise important questions: Do these reforms genuinely empower young Jordanians, or are they largely symbolic gestures designed to maintain the status quo?
Throughout South Africa’s history, young people have been central to the country’s struggles and transformations. Their courage and sacrifice marked a turning point in the liberation movement, demonstrating the power of youth as agents of change. In the democratic era, however, new challenges have emerged - mass unemployment, inequality, poor access to education, and social exclusion continue to undermine the promise of freedom for many young South Africans. To confront these persistent realities, the government introduced the National Youth Policy 2020–2030 (NYP 2030), a decade-long strategy aimed at empowering young people to lead the nation’s next phase of growth and transformation. When such a large stride has been taken by a government, how do we assess the success of such a policy? Is it in its progressive thought, or its effective change? We aim to answer this by analysing the NYP.
